Monday, May 18, 2015


The concept of Leaderless Resistance was proposed by Col. Ulius Louis Amoss, who was the founder of International Service of Information Incorporated, located in Baltimore, Maryland. Col. Amoss died more than fifteen years ago, but during his life was a tireless opponent of communism, as well as a skilled Intelligence Officer. Col. Amoss first wrote of Leaderless Resistance on April 17, 1962. His theories of organization were primarily directed against the threat of eventual Communist take-over in the United States. The present writer, with the benefit of having lived many years beyond Col. Amoss, has taken his theories and expounded upon them. Col. Amos feared the Communists. This author fears the federal government. Communism now represents a threat to no one in the United States, while federal tyranny represents a threat to everyone .The writer has joyfully lived long enough to see the dying breaths of communism, but may, unhappily, remain long enough to see the last grasps of freedom in America.

In the hope that, somehow, America can still produce the brave sons and daughters necessary to fight off ever increasing persecution and oppression, this essay is offered. Frankly, it is too close to call at this point. Those who love liberty, and believe in freedom enough to fight for it are rare today, but within the bosom of every once great nation, there remains secreted, the pearls of former greatness. They are there. I have looked into their sparking eyes; sharing a brief moment in time with them as I passed through this life. Relished their friendship, endured their pain, and they mine. We are a band of brothers, native to the soil gaining strength one from another awe have rushed head long into a battle that all the weaker, timid men, say we cannot win. Perhaps...but then again, perhaps wean. It's not over till the last freedom fighter is buried or imprisoned, or the same happens to those who would destroy their freedom.

Barring any cataclysmic events, the struggle will yet go on for years. The passage of time will make it clear to even the slower among us that the government is the foremost threat to the life, and liberty of the folk. The government will no doubt make today's oppressiveness look like grade school work compared to what they have planned in the future. Meanwhile, there are those of us who continue to hope that somehow the few can do what the many have not. We are cognizant that before things get better they will certainly get worse as government shows a willingness to use ever more severe police state measures against dissidents. This changing situation makes it clear that those who oppose state repression must be prepared to alter, adapt, and modify their behavior, strategy, and tactics as circumstances warrant. Failure to consider new methods and implement them as necessary will make the government's efforts at suppression uncomplicated. It is the duty of every patriot to make the tyrant's life miserable. When one fails to do so he not only fails himself, but his people.

With this in mind, current methods of resistance to tyranny employed by those who love our race, culture, and heritage must pass a litmus test of soundness. Methods must be objectively measured as to their effectiveness, as well as to whether they make the government's intention of repression more possible or more difficult. Those not working to aid our objectives must be discarded or the government benefits from our failure to do so.

As honest men who have banded together into groups or associations of a political or religious nature are falsely labeled "domestic terrorists" or "cultists “and suppressed, it will become necessary to consider other methods of organization--or as the case may very well call forenoon-organization. One should keep in mind that it is not in the government’s interest to eliminate all groups. Some few must remain in order to perpetuate the smoke and mirrors vision forth masses that America is a "free democratic country “where dissent is allowed. Most organizations, however, that possess the potential for effective resistance will not be allowed to continue. Anyone who is so naive as to believe the most powerful government on earth will not crush any who pose a real threat to that power, should not be active, but rather, at home studying political history.

The question as to who is to be left alone and who is not, will be answered by how groups and individuals deal with several factors such as: avoidance of conspiracy plots, rejection of feeble minded malcontents, insistence upon quality of the participants, avoidance of all contact with the front men for the federals--the news media--and, finally, camouflage (which can be defined as the ability to blend in the public's eye the more committed groups of resistance with mainstream "kosher “associations that are generally seen as harmless.) Primarily though, whether any organization is allowed to continue in the future will be a matter of how big a threat a group represents. Not a threat in terms of armed might or political ability, for there is none of either for the present, but rather, threat inters of potentiality. It is potential the federals fear most. Whether that potential exists in an individual or group is incidental. The federals measure potential threat in terms of what might happen given a situation conducive to action on the part of a restive organization or individual. Accurate intelligence gathering allows them to assess the potential. Showing one's hand before the bets are made, is a sure way to lose.

The movement for freedom is rapidly approaching the point where for many people; the option of belonging to a group will be nonexistent. For others, group membership will be a viable option for only the immediate future. Eventually, and perhaps much sooner than most believe possible, the price paid for membership will exceed any perceived benefit. But for now, some of the groups that do exist often serve a useful purpose either for the newcomer who can be indoctrinated into the ideology of the struggle, or for generating positive propaganda to reach potential freedom fighters. It is sure that, for the most part, this struggle is rapidly becoming a matter of individual action, each of its participants making a private decision in the quietness of his heart to resist: to resist by any means necessary. It is hard to know what others will do, for no man truly knows another man's heart. It is enough to know what one will do. A great teacher once said "know thyself." Few men really do, but let each of us, promise ourselves, not to go quietly to the fate our would-be masters have planned.

The concept of Leaderless Resistance is nothing less than a fundamental departure in theories of organization. The orthodox scheme of organization is diagrammatically represented by the pyramid, with the mass at the bottom and the leader at the top. This fundamental of organization is to be seen not only in armies, which are of course, the best illustration of the pyramid structure, with themes of soldiery, the privates, at the bottom responsible to corporals who are in turn responsible to sergeants, and so on up the entire chain of command to the generals at the top. But the same structure is seen in corporations, ladies' garden clubs and in our political system itself. This orthodox "pyramid “scheme of organization is to be seen basically in all existing political, social and religious structures in the world today from the Federal government to the Roman Catholic Church. The Constitution of the United States, in the wisdom of the Founders, tried to sublimate the essential dictatorial nature of pyramidal organization by dividing authority into three: executive, legislative and judicial. But the pyramid remains essentially untouched.

This scheme of organization, the pyramid, is however, not only useless, but extremely dangerous for the participants when it is utilized in a resistance movement against state tyranny. Especially is this so in technologically advanced societies where electronic surveillance can often penetrate the structure revealing its chain of command. Experience has revealed over Andover again that anti-state, political organizations utilizing this method of command and control are easy prey for government infiltration, entrapment, and destruction of the personnel involved. This has been seen repeatedly in the United States where pro-government infiltrators or agent provocateurs weasel their way into patriotic groups and destroy them from within.

In the pyramid type of organization, an infiltrator can destroy anything which is beneath his level of infiltration and often those above him as well. If the traitor has infiltrated at the top, then the entire organization from the top down is compromised and may be traduced at will.

An alternative to the pyramid type of organization is the cell system. In the past, many political groups (both right and left)have used the cell system to further their objectives. Two examples will suffice. During the American Revolution “committees of correspondence" were formed throughout the thirteen colonies.

Their purpose was to subvert the government and thereby aid the cause of independence. The "Sons of Liberty", who made a name for themselves dumping government taxed tea into the harbor at Boston, were the action arm of the committees of correspondence. Each committee was a secret cell that operated totally independently of the other cells. Information on the government was passed from committee to committee, from colony to colony, and then acted upon on a local basis. Yet even in these bygone days of poor communication, of weeks to months for alerter to be delivered, the committees without any central direction whatsoever, were remarkable similar in tactics employed to resist government tyranny. It was, as the first American patriots knew, totally unnecessary for anyone to give an order for anything. Information was made available to each committee, and each committee acted as it saw fit. A recent example of the cell system taken from the left wing of politics are the Communists. The Communist, in order to get around the obvious problems involved in pyramidal organization, developed to an art the cell system. They had numerous independent cells which operated completely isolated from one another and particularly with no knowledge of each other, but were orchestrated together by a central headquarters. For instance, during World War II, in Washington, it is known that there were at least six secret Communist cells operating at high levels in the United States government (plus all the open Communists who were protected and promoted by President Roosevelt), however, only one of the cells was rooted out and destroyed.
How many more actually were operating no one can say for sure.

The Communist cells which operated in the U.S until late 1991 under Soviet control could have at their command a leader, who held a social position which appeared to be very slowly. He could be, for example, a busboy in a restaurant, but in reality colonel or a general in the Soviet Secret Service, the KGB. Under him could be a number of cells and a person active in one cell would almost never have knowledge of individuals who are active in another cell. The value of this is that while any one cell cane infiltrated, exposed or destroyed, such action will have no effect on the other cells; in fact, the members of the other cells will be supporting that cell which is under attack and ordinarily would lend very strong support to it in many ways. This is at least part of the reason, no doubt, that whenever in the past Communists were attacked in this country, support for them sprang up in many unexpected places.

The efficient and effective operation of a cell system after the Communist model, is of course, dependent upon central direction, which means impressive organization, funding from the top, and outside support, all of which the Communists had. Obviously, American patriots have none of these things at the toper anywhere else, and so an effective cell organization based upon the Soviet system of operation is impossible.

Two things become clear from the above discussion. First, that the pyramid type of organization can be penetrated quite easily and it thus is not a sound method of organization in situations where the government has the resources and desire to penetrate the structure; which is the situation in this country. Secondly, that the normal qualifications for the cell structure based upon the Red model does not exist in the U.S. for patriots. This understood, the question arises "What method is left for those resisting state tyranny?" The answer comes from Col. Amoss who proposed the "Phantom Cell" mode of organization. ,which he described as Leaderless Resistance. A system of organization that is based upon the cell organization, but does not have any central control or direction, that is in fact almost identical to the methods used by the Committees of Correspondence during the American Revolution. Utilizing the Leaderless Resistance concept, all individuals and groups operate independently of each other, and never report to a central headquarters or single leader for direction or instruction, as would those who belong to a typical pyramid organization.

At first glance, such a type of organization seems unrealistic, primarily because there appears to be no organization. The natural question thus arises as to how are the “Phantom cells" and individuals to cooperate with each other when there is no intercommunication or central direction? The answer to this question is that participants in a program of Leaderless Resistance through phantom cell or individual action must know exactly what they are doing, and how to do it. It becomes the responsibility of the individual to acquire the necessary skills and information as to what is to be done. Thesis by no means as impractical as it appears, because it is certainly true that in any movement, all persons involved have the same general outlook, are acquainted with the same philosophy, and generally react to given situations in similar ways. The pervious history of the committees of correspondence during the American Revolution show this to be true.

Since the entire purpose of Leaderless Resistance is to defeat state tyranny (at least insofar as this essay is concerned), all members of phantom cells or individuals will tend to react to objective events in the same way through usual tactics of resistance. Organs of information distribution such as newspapers, leaflets, computers, etc., which are widely available to all, keep each person informed of events, allowing for a planned response that will take many variations. No one need issue an order to anyone. Those idealist truly committed to the cause of freedom will act when they feel the time is ripe, or will take their cue from others who precede them. While it is true that much could be said against this type of structure as a method of resistance, it must be kept in mind that Leaderless Resistance is a child of necessity. The alternatives to it have been show to be unworkable or impractical. Leaderless Resistance has worked before in the American Revolution, and if the truly committed put it to use for themselves, it will work now.

Leaderless Resistance leads to very small or even one man cells of resistance. Those who join organizations to play "let’s pretend" or who are "groupies" will quickly be weeded out. While for those who are serious about their opposition to federal despotism, this is exactly what is desired.
From the point of view of tyrants and would be potentates in the federal bureaucracy and police agencies, nothing is more desirable than that those who oppose them be UNIFIED in their command structure, and that every person who opposes them belong to a pyramid type group. Such groups and organizations are an easy kill. Especially in light of the fact that the Justice (sic) Department promised in 1987 that there would never be another group that opposed them that they did not have at least one informer in. These federal "friends of government" are intelligence agents. They gather information that can be used at the whim of a federal D.A. to prosecute. The line of battle has been drawn. Patriots are required therefore, to make a conscious decision to either aid the government in its illegal spying, by continuing with old methods of organization and resistance, or to make the enemies’ job more difficult by implementing effective countermeasures.

Now there will, no doubt, be mentally handicapped people out there who, while standing at a podium with an American flag draped in the background, and a lone eagle soaring in the sky above, will state emphatically in their best sounding red, white, and blue voice, "So what if the government is spying? We are not violating any laws." Such crippled thinking by any serious person is the best example that there is a need for special education classes. The person making such a statements totally out of contact with political reality in this country, and unfit for leadership of anything more than a dog sleigh in the Alaskan wilderness. The old "Born on the fourth of July" mentality that has influenced so much of the American patriot’s thinking in the past will not save him from the government in the future. "Reeducation" forenoon-thinkers of this type will take place in the federal prison system where there are no flags or eagles, but abundance of men who were "not violating any law."

Most groups who "unify" their disparate associates into a single structure have short political lives. Therefore, those movement leaders constantly calling for unity of organization rather than the desirable unity of purpose, usually fall into one of three categories.

They may not be sound political tacticians, but rather, just committed men who feel unity would help their cause, while not realizing that the government would greatly benefit from such efforts. The Federal objective, to imprison or destroy all who oppose them, is made easier in pyramid organizations. Or perhaps, they do not fully understand the struggle they are involved inland that the government they oppose has declared a state of war against those fighting for faith, folk, freedom and constitutional liberty. Those in power will use any means to rid themselves of opposition. The third class calling for unity and let us hope this is the minority of the three, are men more desirous of the supposed power that a large organization would bestow, than of actually achieving their stated purpose.

Conversely, the last thing Federal snoops would have, if they had any choice in the matter, is a thousand different small phantom cells opposing them. It is easy to see why. Such situation is an intelligence nightmare for a government intent upon knowing everything they possibly can about those who oppose them. The Federals, able to amass overwhelming strength of numbers, manpower, resources, intelligence gathering, and capability at any given time, need only a focal point to direct their anger. A single penetration of a pyramid type of organization can lead to the destruction of the whole. Whereas, Leaderless Resistance presents no single opportunity for the Federals to destroy a significant portion of the Resistance.

With the announcement by the Department of Justice (sic) that300 FBI agents formerly assigned to watching Soviet spies in the US (domestic counter intelligence) are now to be used to “combat crime", the federal government is preparing the way for a major assault upon those persons opposed to their policies. Many anti-government groups dedicated to the preservation of the America of our forefathers can expect shortly to feel the brunt of a new federal assault upon liberty.

It is clear, therefore, that it is time to rethink traditional strategy and tactics when it comes to opposing a modern police state. America is quickly moving into a long dark night of police state tyranny, where the rights now accepted by most as being inalienable will disappear. Let the coming night be filled with thousand points of resistance. Like the fog which forms when conditions are right and disappears when they are not, so must the resistance to tyranny be.

"If every person has the right to defend--even by force--his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support common force to protect these rights constantly." ---TheLaw. Frederick Bastiat

Friday, May 15, 2015

Don't laugh! "Putin For President of the United States of America!"

Seriously. Think about it. He's White, Christian, Nationalist and serious about protecting Russia's borders. Putin doesn't take any crap from the homosexuals, the feminists, the intellectuals, environmentalists and the rest of the Leftist filth. The preachers of Islam in the Russian Mosques are restricted by Putin to a gospel of peace. Putin is very pro military and the Russian Armed Forces are honored in massive military parades every year in Red Square. When was the last time an American president honored the thin red line of American heroes in a military parade in Washington, D.C.? Indeed, if the U.S. Constitution has ended under Obama and elective dictatorship is America's fate, then at least let us have a pro- American leader like Putin who supports and defends traditional American values. Vlad, will you be free in 2016? The Republican Party sure could use a man with balls and with Christian family values.

President Vladimir Putin's appearance amid crowds in Moscow honouring ordinary people who served in World War Two seems to be part of an image-change, as...

Thursday, May 14, 2015


There are riots breaking out in Baltimore. These follow on the heels of other riots around the nation — Missouri, New York, Oakland, Emeryville, Berkeley, etc.
There is free floating rage wrecking havoc all over the place, with innocents killed, beaten, sent to the hospital; and emotional trauma galore as people are terrorized. Precious police resources are redirected; millions of dollars wasted; and then, other innocents suffer because of police delays. 
How does it all start? With the steady drumbeat of the leaders, using phrases developed from decades of studying psychology and propaganda, now pumped into the national consciousness. The messages are both old and new — new in that they are transmitted covertly now too, through Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, et al.
The messages are old also because we’ve seen all this before, in revolutions around the world: divide and conquer, class warfare, and on and on it goes . but this has all happened earlier still, before the beginning of time; the Great Destroyer is behind every action that agitates and destroys, that promotes terror and chaos.
What we see today is the inevitable consequences of people in positions of power who promote mayhem and pandemonium, who agitate grudges, lots of grudges, their own and those who can be easily manipulated. Grudges are harbored, nursed, and fomented until they take on a life of their own.
We have a leadership who once was young but now are older, and they cut their teeth in places that we’ve all heard about, groups organized not to spread love or life, but to crash the system, to overwhelm it, to create vague, diffuse panic, first here, then there, so that no one knows where it’s coming from or from where it started. 
They use young people who are lost and disenfranchised to do the dirty work; and, as with most revolutions and wars, the masterminds don’t get their hands dirty. (1) Same with the Internet warriors, those people with day jobs who agitate online, anonymously, trolling, maybe for themselves, maybe for pay.
And if anyone dares to disagree, to balk, to express concern for those young, poor people who are used, then spit out, there are all sorts of repercussions. . . because that’s how terrorism works; dissenters cannot speak up, they must shut up; and the movers and shakers make sure this happens through their control of Facebook and unions and the easily programmed young people; while the masterminds relax in the evening, in leafy suburbs, in houses worth several millions from lucrative lecture tours and books still paying generous royalties.
And the dissidents? They get ostracized, marginalized, ridiculed, threatened. Familiar tactics, practiced a hundred years ago in Russia, then China, Cambodia and all the rest. . . . later imported to the US in the 60s, engineered and paid for by those with unlimited cash to do so: foundations, governmental GMOs, nonprofit agencies with names that keep changing.
This is the situation that we have today, though it is easy to become desensitized by it; it’s been several long years of it; it’s easy to start believing that this is how it was in the past. It wasn’t. 
So, voting public. I say this to you: pay attention not to your fantasies and wishes, not to your utopian visions, which will not take place in this lifetime, no matter how hard you try. Don’t vote with your grudges; vote with love, vote from your better angels. 
You are not a cosmic mistake, you are not as low as a baboon or ape; you are a soul in a human body — remember who you are and Who created you. Listen to the Voice of the Divine who breathed you into existence. If something promotes love, it is good. If something promotes hatred and aggression, it is bad.
And vote next year this way, vote with love. Vote from the kind of love that wakes you up in the middle of the night sobbing because you’re loved by a love that you didn’t even know possible; the kind of love that brings you to your knees because you are cherished and forgiven in spite of who you are and everything that you’ve ever done.
Face it, Mr. and Mrs. America. Face it, voting public. Despite your good intentions, look reality in the face. Things are terrible and terrifying and only getting worse. Destruction, terror, ruination. . . a country hangs by a thread.
Pay attention this time. Align yourself with God’s will. Embrace hope, the real hope, that is, God. He is the only possibility of hope in this broken, fallen world. 
Next year, don’t continue to take us down a treacherous cliff. Remember what children do– and adults when they are not paying attention. 
What do they do? They follow the leader. Sometimes blindly
(1) A then-young African American reporter, Juan Williams, published an article in the Washington Post in the 80s. In it, he lambasted the Left for using young blacks as cannon fodder. He demanded that they get their own hands dirty and fight their own wars. Not much is said about this anymore, tragically.
Posted on by Robin


Graph of most popular countries among blog viewers
United States


United Kingdom









Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Walter Williams: Black Lives Matter

The Tunnel Wall: 
 HopeN'Change: Fallen Heroes  ". . . the real problem is a "lack of trust" between minority communities and the police. A "lack of trust" fomented by the likes of Barack Obama when he refers to the Ferguson police as oppressors. A "lack of trust" that gets officers killed.

 obama, obama jokes, political, humor, cartoon, conservative, hope n' change, hope and change, stilton jarlsberg, brian moore, liquori tate, benjamin deen, police, killings, freddie gray, ferguson, baltimore, police week

This Is Police Memorial Week – Appreciate Them While You Still Can . . . " Obama is behind the movement to demonize police so he can federalize them just as he did to doctors, insurance companies, bankers, and Israelis.
"One source said they might turn their backs on Barack Obama Friday during the Memorial service. If they do, we need to support them.
"Mr. Obama has made the police the enemy. You think we’d get smart after he’s done it so many times to push he far-left agenda."


I agreed to enter a partnership with Penny Alesi to expose the infamous “Black Jack” Idema, the former husband of Ms. Alesi in 2010. The basis of this alliance was trust and we both pledged mutual honesty in our quest to expose every secret thing that touched on the life of this American traitor. During the next five years we would produce dozens of articles on my blog with documents and pictures supporting our arguments.

The division of labor in this undertaking was one where Ms. Alesi provided the documents, pictures and rough drafts of the proposed articles. I would rewrite her first drafts and whip them into a publishable article. Ms. Alesi would proof read and offer suggestions to improve them. Then a final draft would be produced by me and published. This book length series of articles has remained on my blog for five years as my property, the only form of compensation that Ms. Alesi could offer, as she was barely surviving on a small Social Security disability benefit from the government.

I will fast forward to 2015 and my week long working vacation (April 22 to April 28 2015) with Ms. Alesi near her home in New Fairfield, Connecticut where we met daily for long interviews hours in length and viewed new material she produced. It was in the course of these interviews with Ms. Alesi at the “Bed and Breakfast Inn” in Danbury, Connecticut I discovered she had lied on several key points concerning her reason to be in Mexico with Black Jack Idema.

This information proved to be a game changer for me. I realized right away that I had been recruited to her cause by lies and my friend, Ms. Alesi, was not my friend. I felt betrayed and quite upset, but I successfully hid my true feelings behind a professional mask, and we finished the interviews on April 28th with a photo session. Ms. Alesi was well dressed for the photo op and neither looked or acted like the terminal AIDS patient with only six months to live. Ms. Alesi made a shocking statement, as I was getting into the limo for the long drive to JFK International Airport, “This will be the last time you see me alive.”

The next two weeks were a time of great mental anguish for me. I still felt bound by a friendship five years long marked by countless long distance phone calls and hundreds of emails. In a way Ms. Alesi had become family, so I felt bound by loyalty to her above friendship and a work relationship. However, the lies that she told me prior to 2015, and now confessed to without batting an eye, made continued partnership with her impossible.
The Alesi Confession also opened the gates of legal hell for me should I continue as her partner.
Therefore, I cut off all relationship of any type with Ms. Penny Alesi of New Fairfield, Connecticut. I consider all material given by her to me for the production of a Kindle book on Black Jack Idema to be my personal property that was given to me as a QUID PRO QUO in lieu of monetary compensation for my work.




Sunday, May 10, 2015



The Democrat Party funded rent-a-mob was back in action again blocking the major intersection at Pike Street and Third Avenue, thus ruining the business of a major Seattle attraction on a busy Saturday night, and tying up traffic around a major intersection.


The motley crowd of disgusting body odors was mostly white Leftist rent-a-mob parasites, who are paid an hourly wage by Democrat Party community activists to attend such activities and hold signs denouncing "White Privilege," and staying safe in the back on the mob, while pushing out a few black activists who are not paid anything to be the first to take the hit from police should a riot develop.


This is your time honored Leftist tactic of creating martyrs from idealistic persons who really think they are serving the cause of justice and equality, but in fact are expendable pawns in the Left's march to total control over America.


In marked contrast, the Seattle Police Department displayed a high level of professionalism in the face of a mob that wanted the SPD to move to the brute force level of confrontation.